In applications such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices, wearables, and remote sensors, the battery life of wireless modules is often the lifeline that determines the success or failure of a product. Users complain that "charging every day is too inconvenient," and engineers are troubled by "why is the actual battery life far lower than the theoretical value?" Often, the problem doesn't lie with the battery itself, but with our insufficient understanding of the key factors affecting the power consumption of wireless modules. Let's dissect the culprits that truly "steal" your battery.

Different wireless transmission methods (such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth LE, Zigbee, LoRa, NB-IoT) inherently have vastly different power consumption characteristics. Wi-Fi, high speed but high power consumption, is suitable for scenarios requiring frequent transmission of large amounts of data, but it's not battery-friendly. Bluetooth LE (BLE), designed specifically for low power consumption, significantly reduces average power consumption through extremely short connection intervals and deep sleep modes, making it the preferred choice for wearable devices. LoRa/NB-IoT, Ultra-Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) technology, sacrifices speed for ultra-long range and ultra-low power consumption, suitable for sensors that don't require battery replacement for months or even years. Therefore, it's crucial to select the most suitable protocol based on the application scenario.

Transmit power (TX Power) isn't always better the higher it is. While increasing transmit power enhances signal coverage and interference resistance, power consumption increases exponentially! Many developers, for "safety's sake," max out the power, unaware that this is a battery drain killer. The optimization strategy should be to use the lowest possible transmit power while still meeting communication distance and link quality requirements.

Receiver sensitivity measures the minimum usable signal strength a module can receive. Higher sensitivity (more negative values, e.g., -105dBm is better than -95dBm) means reliable communication even with weak signals. High sensitivity allows the device to operate at greater distances or in worse environments, or conversely, allows you to reduce the transmitter power, indirectly saving power. Meanwhile, the receive state (RX) itself consumes power; high sensitivity may shorten the time spent searching for/waiting for a valid signal.

Duty cycle causes the module to repeatedly switch between sleep and wake-up states! The wireless module should spend most of its time in deep sleep, only waking up when communication is needed. First, optimizing send and receive times, reducing unnecessary communication frequency, compressing data packet size, and optimizing protocol stack efficiency can all shorten active time. Then there's the deep sleep current. Although the current during deep sleep (typically in the μA or even nA range) is small, multiplied by the long standby time, the total amount is not negligible. Choosing a module with extremely low deep sleep current is crucial.

Peripheral circuitry and power management also require attention. The choice of LDO and DC-DC converter is important because the power conversion efficiency of the module directly affects overall power consumption. Similarly, GPIO state control cannot be ignored. Unused GPIO pins should be set to a defined state (e.g., pull-up/pull-down) to avoid floating and accumulating small leakage current. External components also affect power consumption; for example, poor antenna matching can lead to low transmission efficiency, forcing the module to increase power compensation. Filters, amplifiers, and other peripheral circuits also have static power consumption.

Environment is also a major factor affecting power consumption. In environments with weak signals or strong interference, the module needs to retransmit data packets, increase transmit power, and extend receive time to maintain the connection, causing power consumption to spike. Extreme temperatures (especially low temperatures) significantly reduce battery capacity and chemical activity.

Extending the battery life of wireless modules cannot be achieved through a single method; it requires a systematic approach. Only by comprehensively addressing these aspects can a significant improvement in battery life be truly realized. Every microamp of current saving, multiplied by the device's lifespan, translates into a massive leap in battery life!