I. Overview

With the popularization of IoT technology, Bluetooth Beacon and iBeacon have become core technologies for indoor positioning and smart scene applications. However, many people are still confused about the concepts of the two. This article will delve into their differences and recommend two high-performance, cost-effective EBYTE Bluetooth modules to help you easily choose the right one!

II. Beacon and iBeacon: Essence and Definition

1. Bluetooth Beacon (Beacon)

Technical Basis: Broadcast technology based on the BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) protocol. It can continuously send signals without pairing and is mainly used for positioning, data transmission triggering, and other scenarios.

Core Function: By broadcasting fixed data packets containing information such as device ID and signal strength (RSSI), it helps terminal devices (such as mobile phones) achieve location awareness.

Universality: Supports multiple protocol formats (such as iBeacon, Eddystone), compatible with cross-platform applications.

2. iBeacon

Apple's proprietary specification: Introduced by Apple in 2013, iBeacon is a specific implementation of Beacon technology and must adhere to a specific data frame format (such as UUID, Major, Minor, and other identifier fields).

System integration: iOS devices natively support iBeacon through the CoreLocation framework, while Android requires a third-party library.

Application scenarios: Primarily used for precision marketing scenarios within the Apple ecosystem, such as retail push notifications and indoor navigation.

III. Comparison of Core Differences

Dimension

Bluetooth Beacon

iBeacon

Agreement ownership

A universal technical standard that supports multiple protocols (such as Eddystone).

Apple's proprietary protocol has a fixed data format.

compatibility

Cross-platform (iOS/Android/other systems)

Prioritize iOS adaptation; Android requires additional development.

Data forma

Flexible and customizable

Fixed structure (UUID + Major + Minor + TX power)

Application scenarios

Asset tracking, industrial positioning, and multi-protocol scenarios

Apple's ecosystem of precision marketing and indoor navigation

Development freedom

High (open source support)

Restricted (subject to Apple guidelines)

Example:

The iBeacon broadcast packet format has a fixed prefix (e.g., 02 01 06 1A FF 4C 00 02 15), followed by fields such as UUID and Major.

Regular Beacons can have custom content, such as transparent transmission of temperature and humidity sensor data.

IV. Technology Selection Recommendations

Choose Beacon: For projects requiring cross-platform compatibility, custom data, or non-Apple ecosystem applications (e.g., Industrial IoT).

Choose iBeacon: For targeted marketing to iOS users (e.g., shopping mall promotional pushes) or scenarios requiring deep integration with the Apple ecosystem.

V. EBYTE Bluetooth Module Recommendation

EBYTE, a leading domestic IoT communication module manufacturer, offers multiple Bluetooth modules supporting Beacon/iBeacon. The following are two featured products:

1. E104-BT53A3

Key Features:

① Master-slave integrated, supports multi-device connection and OTA upgrade;

② Protocol support: BLE 5.2 + iBeacon broadcast switching.

2. E104-BT08

Key Features:

① Supports MAC binding and over-the-air parameter configuration, simplifying deployment;

② Ultra-low cost (below 8 RMB), suitable for large-scale commercial use;

③ Protocol support: BLE 5.2 + iBeacon broadcast switching.

VI. Conclusion

Bluetooth Beacons are the "cornerstone" of technology, while iBeacons are "exclusive tools" within the Apple ecosystem. When choosing between them, compatibility, cost, and development freedom must be weighed based on project requirements. EBYTE's E104-BT53A3 and E104-BT08, with their high performance and cost-effectiveness, have become ideal choices for smart city and industrial IoT scenarios.